![]() My version also has a few implications that are far worse. I read this tonight, and sadly, the story was all to familiar to me. PayPal did not divulge any credit card details related to this account. You can, however, have your card issuer generate a single-use number and enter that, even if the number has already been used elsewhere. So you cannot actually remove your credit card information (unless you replace it with your bank information), and you cannot enter an invalid card number. Update (): GoDaddy requires a valid payment method for each domain. He recommends two-factor authentication, not storing credit card information with your accounts (to prevent it from being used for fraudulent verification), and not using a custom domain for your e-mail address of record. I had no way to prove I was the real owner of the domain name. In fact, all of my information had been changed. This didn’t work because the credit card information had already been changed by an attacker. The representative asked me the last 6 digits of my credit card number as a method of verification. ![]() I called GoDaddy and explained the situation. ![]() I tried to log in to my GoDaddy account, but it didn’t work. Twitter Username Stolen Thanks to PayPal and GoDaddy Using Objective-C code on full in-memory objects that have been deserialized.Ĭore Data Full-Text Search iOS Mac Objective-C Open Source Programming SQLite YapDatabase.Using a secondary SQLite index, which you explicitly set up and query using SQL fragments.It looks like there are four different mechanisms for selecting/filtering objects: In contrast to Core Data, it’s quasi-schemaless, although it does have some support for relationships. It’s based on SQLite, which it uses as a collection-key-value store. I skimmed the wiki to try to figure out the general architecture. You know, the way you’re used to dealing with objects. This gives you complete control over your objects, and how & when you access and mutate them. YapDatabase will never mutate any of your objects. This could be via NSCoding, or any other way you want such as JSON serialization. As long as the object can somehow be serialized & deserialized you’re good to go. This includes your own NSObject subclasses, as well as the usual suspects such as NSString, NSNumber, UIColor, UIImage, etc. YapDatabase doesn’t use NSManagedObject, or any similar kind of silliness. It won’t play nicely, and so we’re forced to play entirely by its rules. Because NSManagedObjectContext isn’t going to follow our rules. We can’t just wrap one of these things in a lock, or only access it through a serial queue. But NSManagedObject presents a whole new set of problems. And developers understand the implications concerning threading: “Don’t be mutating something on one thread if it’s being used on another.” This is something we’ve lived with for a long time, and we’re quite adept at solving these problems. ![]() Especially in objective-c where there are often 2 versions of a class, one mutable and one immutable. Developers understand mutable vs immutable. The fact is, the rules for NSManagedObject don’t follow the same rules you have for all other objects. Why is it not safe to pass a NSManagedObject to background threads? Because that darn NSManagedObjectContext may mutate the thing at any time. So it must wrap it inside something else, and change that. And Core Data wants to update the object you have in your hand, at the moment the context merges changes from another context. It must be wrapped inside a NSManagedObject. You cannot store a plain-old NSString in Core Data.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |